Over 30% shift stance on ethical dilemmas after AI rebuttal, Japan study shows

Original source (on modern site) | Article images: [1] [2]

Researchers led by Kouhei Masumoto, a professor of psychology at Kobe University, posed ethical dilemmas that are variations of the classic trolley problem to participants of a study and presented them with artificial intelligence-generated counterarguments for the two choices they could make. | Aflo

If ChatGPT challenged your moral judgment, would you be persuaded?

A recent study suggests that more than 30% of people would, highlighting the significant influence of artificial intelligence on views about questions with no easy answers.

The study also found that older adults showed a greater tendency to be swayed in their opinions, pointing to a potential danger of persuasive technologies in a rapidly graying society such as Japan.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information,

quality journalism is more crucial than ever.

By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

< Back to Lunar News JP front page

A Lunar Project service. Powered by Mozilla Readability (Andres Rey PHP Port) and SimplePie.